In Marciana Gr. Z. 11 (379), notes in the margins are quite rare. In the Greek column, marginal notes are mostly of liturgical type or they serve textual purposes: corrections or additions of forgotten words, additions of textual variants. In the beginning of Romans, however, we came across another kind of note.
Is it a fact that the Greek, the Latin and the Arabic texts share the same support, sufficient to argue that they are related? Of course not. Many parts of the manuscript point out that the three versions are independent from each other... Really?
I had the great opportunity to participate last week at the international conference “Translators, copists and interpreters: Jews, Christians and Muslims and the transmission of the Bible in Arabic in the Middle Age”, 26-28 April in Cordoba.
For the occasion, I presented a paper about the Marc. Gr. Z. 11 (379). I demonstrated that the Arabic translation has a Latin origin, more precisely a Vulgate text.
The first version of HumaReC was launched in March, the 7th. Three months later, is the plateform visited enough ? Are we visible enough on the web ? What can we do to enhance the traffic on our webpage ? HumaReC is happy to share with you glimpses of answers, harvested from our web analytics data.
Of which kind is the Greek text in our manuscript? This article summarizes some observations based on the folios that we have on the platform at the moment.
