- Posts: 101
- Thank you received: 1
Folio 125r
05 May 2017 19:26 #47
by sschulthess
Replied by sschulthess on topic Folio 125r
Yes this was also my observation:
https://humarec.org/index.php/continuous-publications-blog/25-important-comments-on-the-arabic-translation
This also similar to the text in Vat. Lat. 12900.
My next step is now to focus on the differences. Was it "orientalized" or "de-orientalized" at the time when the Madrid BN 4971 was made?
A complete comparison with Vat. Lat. 12900 will be helful.
Thanks for your remarks that are always very helpful.
My next step is now to focus on the differences. Was it "orientalized" or "de-orientalized" at the time when the Madrid BN 4971 was made?
A complete comparison with Vat. Lat. 12900 will be helful.
Thanks for your remarks that are always very helpful.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
05 May 2017 19:44 #48
by morozov53
Replied by morozov53 on topic Folio 125r
Yes, I understood this by the choice of the extracts )) Judging by the plate in Specimina Codicum Latinorum, Vat. Lat. 12900 is in a very bad condition and some passages are scarcely readable, but now it is more easy.
)) Judging by the plate in Specimina Codicum Latinorum, Vat. Lat. 12900 is in a very bad condition and some passages are scarcely readable, but now it is more easy. Please Log in to join the conversation.